THE LONG GAME: FINDING A POSTDOC

You have passed your qualifying exam, you have some data in hand, and you're working away at crafting your PhD chapters. Maybe you're even doing outreach, managing to attend seminars or conferences occasionally, and hopefully taking care of your mental health. The end is finally in sight. Now how in the world do you find a postdoc?

A postdoc is an exciting time.  In the words of one survey respondent: “Be excited! A postdoc was the most free and exciting time of my academic career. An opportunity to work independently without the additional responsibilities of being a student or faculty member. I love being a faculty member, but being a postdoc was the best job I've ever had.” Another replied: “I found a post doc to be the most rewarding experience. I moved internationally (to the US) and met an amazing community of motivated and enthusiastic scientists. The insecure work really does suck, but I never could complain about what I got to do and what opportunities were opened up as a result. Having the support to develop my own research ideas, make mistakes, and try new things, has been hugely influential in my growth as a scientist.”

Finding (and landing) a postdoc position can be tricky! Below we have advice from 23 current and recent postdocs on finding a great postdoc position. At the end of this post, we also provide a list of the major earth science postdoc employers. One of the main themes is that the best way to find a postdoc is by getting to know lots of people in your discipline as early as possible and getting them interested you and in your research. Most of our respondents started reaching out or applying to positions over 1 year before defending.

Start by talking to folks at conferences years before you plan to defend. Find mutual interests and keep in touch.  If you have an idea that would make a great postdoc for you, suggest writing a proposal together (either an NSF Postdoctoral Fellowship or a full proposal, or both!).  Like graduate school, most of the time the postdoc finds the advisor, not the other way around. Realize that you’ll be much more competitive for a position tailored to you (like if you’re written into a proposal) than for a position that is advertised on a website for all to apply. We recognize crafting potentially multiple new projects from scratch is a lot of work. If you are pursuing tenure track or research positions, you will need these ideas fleshed out anyway! Win win!

Here's a rough timeline, and as one participant reminds us “you can (usually) defer the start of a post doc by 6 months or 1 year” so don’t worry getting a position before you can actually start.

Advice on searching for positions:

“Network, network, network - start early, do this often, and keep in periodic contact with your network members. Finding people you want to work with after your PhD years before defending provides ample time to access a range of funding proposal opportunities.”

“Many opportunities are not advertised or planned. They result from the fortuitous circumstances of funding for a PI (extra money for personnel because they couldn't recruit a grad student or their grad student got their own funding, they have start-up money, etc). Conferencing and networking in the last years of your PhD are important for establishing those connections that can open such unplanned doors.”

“Look for someone who is in a different research network/academic family than your PhD advisor. Expand your network! Ideally also go to a different institution.”

“The best connections will come at the edges of your professional network—collaborators of collaborators, not necessarily people you already know well. Don’t be shy about reaching out to people you admire.”

 “Don't be afraid to reach out to people to see if they have any postdoc funding coming up. Think about people you've met at your posters and talks, at conferences, during conference field trips, at colloquia, etc. All of these contacts are potential PIs! Cast your net broadly - apply to as many opportunities as you have the energy to complete, and have a couple different projects in mind. I wouldn't recommend shopping around the same project at every institution.”

“Using the online job posting sites (e.g., GSA Jobs Board) and listservs (e.g., geo-tectonics) are great resources for searching out positions”

“For international students, many NSF, DOE, EPA, USFS, and NASA fellowships are not available. Focus on the departmental fellowships and grant fundings in your search, and apply to as many of those as possible.” 

Advice on applications:

“Be sure you communicate with the prospective PI before and during the application process. They should not be surprised to see your application and should be championing your proposal through the selection process to the extent they are able.”

“Make sure you define your research topic clearly - remember, this might be a much shorter position than your PhD. You need to propose something that you'll be able to actually do in that time.”

“Have peers and committee member(s) review your application materials as you write them.”

“Think about your vision for the future and what it is that defines you independent from your advisor. If you approach someone about postdoc opportunities who isn't specifically advertising a postdoc position, come prepared with your own project ideas. A PI is more likely to support you if you add to their group. If they already have a predefined project they want someone to work on, they will probably just recruit a cheaper graduate student than an expensive postdoc.”

“(1) Don't hesitate to ask for advices from PhD advisor, faculty members, peers about the research proposal/personal statement, (2) if possible send the proposal draft to the potential postdoc advisor/host to ask for feedback, (3) if applying for a specific project, research about the project as much as possible and know what kind of background the PI is looking for and emphasize those in the personal statement, (4) if possible, taking part in a review panel (NSF/NASA) can be good as it gives an idea of how proposals are evaluated and what the reviewers look for.”

“Spend effort to individualize the applications, you are a specialist and people are looking for highly specialized researchers.”

“It was super useful to write with a number of potential mentors and learn from their feedback - so even those that didn’t get funded were overall positive mentorship and training experiences”

“For a specific advertised role: be specific- how are your skills going to benefit the project? What kind of outcomes can one expect. For a general funding application: be ambitious, try to envision the most interesting way applying your research. How would you achieve that?”

“There are positives and negative with working with big name people vs working with early career people, weigh these options carefully, and choose the option that will set you up for the career you want.”

“The tradeoff to writing something large like NSF EAR-PF or full NSF proposals with a mentor is less time available for institutional / departmental fellowships, which may mean less total fellowship applications that ultimately get submitted.”

“Diversify your skill set, learn new methods or new applications of your known methods. Do not only propose academic goals but also propose ways you will contribute to the diversity and outreach goal for your potential lab group. Sell yourself as a mutually beneficial addition to the lab group, demonstrate what unique skills you have the bring to the lab.”

“Once you get a fixed term post-doc, keep applying for more opportunities. You may not get a faculty job in that time and trying to set up a second postdoc quickly is tough.”

Most respondents applied to between 2 to 7 positions.

Now for some specifics on the types of positions…  We’ve asked current and recent postdocs for the pros and cons of their positions.  Some of these positions come with less than a year of funding, and others can extend for 5+ years. Some positions include funding for conferences, field work, analyses, and publishing costs.  Here’s a breakdown of the funding particulars of our respondents, and as you can see, it’s variable!

Departmental Fellowships

Many schools offer departmental postdoc fellowships. Here’s some that come to mind, but also check at institutions that you’re interested in.  Departmental fellowships are a great avenue to a postdoc, and often come with both salary and a research budget. And if you know of other departmental fellowships, please let us know so we can grow our list!

CONS:

  • not necessarily tied to a specific PI, so there can be a lack of a support structure

  • funding for analyses isn’t always included

  • geographically fixed

PROS:

  • autonomy and freedom to direct research 




Note: there’s a big difference between institutional and departmental postdocs.  Many schools offer institutional postdocs BUT then you’re competing against all other departments and usually earth science folks won’t be super competitive.  On the other hand, departmental fellowships are a great way to get $$$ for a postdoc at prestigious institutions!

  • Arizona State University Exploration Fellowship

  • Harvard Daly Postdoc and General Postdoc

  • Princeton Hess Fellowship

  • Yale Bateman, Interdepartmental and Flint Postdoctoral Fellowships

  • University of Chicago TC Chamberlin Postdoctoral Fellowship

  • MIT Distinguished Postdoctoral Fellowship

  • Johns Hopkins Blaustein Earth & Planetary Sciences Postdoctoral Fellowship

  • Caltech offers several postdoctoral fellowships

  • Brown University

  • University of Texas Jackson School Distinguished Postdoctoral Fellowship

  • Scripps Institutional Postdoctoral Program (while this is an institutional fellowship, it is an oceanographic institution)

  • Carnegie Postdoctoral Fellowship

  • Smithsonian Institution Fellowship Program

  • Lamont-Doherty (Columbia) LDEO Postdoctoral Fellowships

  • Rice Pan Postdoctoral Fellowship Program

Fellowships where you write a project proposal to get funded

NSF EAR Postdoctoral Fellowships provide 2 years of funding with research funds.  October deadline. Great opportunity to figure out what you want to pursue next, even if it doesn’t get funded.

CONS:

  • fixed national rate, which can be tough in pricey parts of the US

  • usually must pay for your own health insurance (not covered by university)

  • might be less involved with active projects in a research group

 PROS:

  • Intellectual freedom / flexibility to develop research agenda

  • control budget and can take it with you

  • comes with $25k of research funds per year

  • time for research

NOAA Global Change Fellowships: Appointed fellows are employees of UCAR and receive a fixed annual salary plus UCAR employment benefits. Fellows can be hosted at participating U.S. universities and research institutions. The program focuses on observing, understanding, modeling, and predicting climate variability and change on seasonal and longer time scales. This includes the documentation and analysis of past, current, or possible future climate variability and change as well as the study of the underlying physical, chemical, and biological processes.

USGS Mendenhall Research Fellowship Program: Positions are advertised online and require a proposal.  The themes of the solicitations are often set by initiated grad students who find a potential mentor, and get a solicitation written around what they want to do!  Mendenhall postdoc positions often lead to full time employment with the USGS.

NASA Postdoctoral Programs: can be a good fit for those interested in planetary science, astrobiology, remote sensing, and much more!

 Other Federal Agencies

  • Department of Energy

  • Department of Defense

  • EPA

 other types of postdocs

National Labs are located all over the US and offer postdoc positions. The positions are usually targeted and have predefined research goals. Each lab hosts its own list of positions, so check the websites for solicitations!

State agencies also put out solicitations for postdocs

Private Foundations sometimes sponsor postdoc positions related to their mission, like the Agouron Geobiology postdoc, or the Simons Foundation Origins of Life program. 

Lab-based postdocs: Many labs hire postdocs to run day to day operations or get new techniques online.  These are exciting, and might be advertised, but are often discovered through word of mouth.

 CONS:

  • lots of time working on lab upkeep

PROS:

  • cutting edge techniques


Advertised positions: Sometimes, you get lucky, and a PI is looking for a postdoc with your skillset! Job boards and listservs are a great way to find about postdoc (and faculty) positions, while also keeping a pulse on the long-term goals of the community. These will be discipline specific so ask your advisor and colleagues which listservs they follow.

CONS:

  • often shorter positions/less time with guaranteed funding

  • can lead to workload overreach

  • can be hard to obtain funds for tangentially related work (or side projects)

 PROS:

  • know what you’re getting into

  • don’t have to manage funding but are generally well-supported

  • training


Here are some recommended job boards where postdoc opportunities are advertised:

Postdocs abroad

In addition to postdoc positions advertised by a specific PI, there are some international fellowship programs.

 CONS:

  • far from home

  • challenging logistics!

  • sometimes no moving expenses

PROS:

  • build international collaborations and networks

Marie Curie Fellowship Program: Usually due in September.  Fund 1-2 years of research in Europe. EU nationals can also apply for a separate program to work outside the EU.

Humboldt Research Fellowship: Rolling deadline. Funds 6 months to 2 years of research in Germany.

Fulbright Postdoctoral and Early Career Awards

As a slight aside, we’d also encourage you to start applying for faculty jobs as soon as possible if that’s the route you want to go. Writing research, teaching, and diversity statements takes time, and applying early is a great way to start ironing out the issues. Recognize that it might (probably will!) take several rounds of applications to land a faculty job, so why not start early? You can almost always defer the start date for a faculty position if you do manage to land both a postdoc and a faculty job.

For postdoc positions, there are lots of sites, fellowship programs, and listservs to check out. Our list is written from a US centric point of view, but we’d love to hear from international colleagues about other opportunities!

Happy searching,

The futureROCKdoc team

A sincere thank you to our respondents: Nathan Stevens, Kara Brugman, Daniel Ibarra, Zach Sickmann, Christina Richardson, Marjorie Cantine, Robert Holder, Tyson Smith, Kei Shimizu, Gilby Jepson, Jeremy Patterson, Penny Wieser, Sophie Goliber, Nikki Seymour, Yuxin Zhou, Allie Nagurney, Margo Odlum, Chelsea Mackaman-Lofland, Kelly Thomson, Martin, Tarryn, and a few anonymous contributors.

Written by Sarah W.M. George

Edited by Kristina L. Butler and Emily E. Mixon

Questions you should ask a potential graduate school adviser

(and HINT: their past and current graduate students!!)

Q’s for a potential graduate school adviser

Financial support:

 How will I be financially supported?

            TA – teaching assistantship

            RA – research assistantship

            Fellowship – external fellowship or internal departmental fellowship

 Is there financial support available for conference, lab, and/fieldwork travel? What expenses are my responsibility?

Are research analytical costs covered or is there an expectation that I bring in money to pay for my own research costs?

Will I be guaranteed financial support during the summer?

Mentorship style:

How frequently do you meet with your graduate students, one-on-one and as a group?

How do you prefer to communicate with your graduate students (e.g. email, in person, text)?

What type of guidance do you provide on research project development?

For field-based projects, will you join be during field seasons or will I be mostly independent during field work?

What are your expectations for your graduate students regarding publishing and how do you help them accomplish these goals? 

Who in the group teaches new members about lab safety, and any instrumentation/lab protocols? Is there a lab manager or is this knowledge handed down by senior grads and post docs, or direct from advisor?

Post-graduate school career questions:

What types of jobs do most of your students get (e.g. academic, government, industry etc.)?

Q’s for a potential adviser’s past and current graduate students

Financial support:

How are most of the graduate students in your research group supported?

How much is the graduate stipend and is it enough to live off of?

Does your adviser pay for conference, lab, and/fieldwork travel? Are there department resources for these activities? What expenses have you had to personally covered?

Have you been financially supported over summers? And/or is your adviser ok with their graduate students doing internships?

Does your adviser have an expectation that you bring in your own research grant money?

Mentorship style:

Does your adviser give you advice on non-research related topics like courses to take, degree completion requirements, job or internship search, etc.?

Does your adviser edit your research grant proposals, conference abstracts and papers?

How often do you meet one-on-one with your adviser vs. as a group?

Does your adviser connect you to the resources you need for training or is it your responsibility to figure out who to talk to for research-related training?

If you are supported on a TA or Fellowship, are you expected to participate in lab duties unrelated to your research? 

How much guidance did your adviser provide on research project development? Were you expected to come up with your own ideas/hypotheses or was this developed alongside your mentor? Did your adviser have an idea that you were then expected to run with?

How quickly does your adviser turn around edits on manuscripts and are the comments constructive?

Overall, do you feel supported by your adviser?

Is there anything I should clarify before accepting an offer?

What is the most challenging aspect of working with your adviser?

How did your group function during the peak of the pandemic? Are there any positive or negative things that COVID revealed about your group dynamic?

Is your advisor committed to and active in DEI efforts? Do they support their students spending time on this type of service?

 Post-grad career questions:

 Does your adviser help you with post-grad applications, like postdoctoral research proposals or tenure track job applications?

 Do you feel like your advisor has a network that can connect you both within and beyond the academy?

 When you go to conferences, does your advisor help you decide on sessions to attend and actively introduce you to people?

 ——

Good luck y’all!

The futureROCKdoc team:

Kristina, Sarah, Emily & Tony

If you have suggestions for additional questions message us on Twitter @futurerockdoc or comment below!

GSA graduate student research grants - advice from a panel of awardees

The GSA graduate student research grant supports graduate research in the geosciences via awards of up to $2,500 to geoscience graduate students enrolled in universities in the USA, Canada, Mexico, and Central America. According to GSA, in in 2020, $651,645 was awarded to 360 graduate students (~55% of the 657 who applied), with an average grant of $1,820. The deadline for the 2021 application is February 2, 2021, and applicants must be a current GSA student member to apply.

We surveyed 18 geoscience graduate students awarded 1 or more GSA research grants. If you are an awardee and wish to be added to the survey, email us! Applicants, if you have questions, submit in the comments section below!

Applications require (1) a presentation of the problem, hypothesis, and overall objectives (2) a section discussing the scientific and society significance of the proposed work (3) a statement of your research plan (4) a budget and budget justification. We asked our survey participants for advice in each of these areas.

Survey Participant Demographics

Survey Participant Demographics

Advice on writing a compelling hypothesis

It's ok not to have data. My hypothesis was graphically described in my figure -which was the reviewer's favorite part. 

State a TESTABLE hypothesis, and make sure you demonstrate how the methods you will use address the hypothesis. Make inferences about the outcome of the study, especially how any result is a valuable contribution.

Make sure it is right up front and that what you are trying to test is very clear. I found it helpful to literally say "I am testing the hypothesis that...X is caused by Y, by doing Z...". Reviewers see so many of these, help them out by being explicit and clear and easy to read.

 Clearly outline the hypotheses by using an H1, H2, etc. to make it easy for reviewers to find them. When brainstorming/drafting this grant, I often iterated over the hypotheses multiple times as I continued to refine the problem statement and methods to get a testable, narrowed hypothesis.

Be very, very specific and ensure that it is a testable hypothesis with the methods presented! For both of my applications, I included a statement at the end of the hypothesis section that literally started with 'I hypothesize that: 1) , 2) , and 3) . This way, the reviewers have no difficulty ensuring that you have a clear hypothesis.

 Clearly state the hypothesis without fluff, and provide specific methods for how you would confirm or not confirm that your hypothesis is correct. Fully explain how the methods would investigate the problem, and how they would help to answer your questions.

Informally talk to peers about your idea(s) first. If it you can explain it to them and it generates some excitement then there's a good chance it's compelling.

Use clear, explicit language so your research problem, hypothesis, and objective can be easily identified. It might help to keep the scope of the proposal relatively narrow and focus on one easily obtainable objective, even if your project is broader

Advice on writing a compelling significance section

As narrowed as the hypotheses and problem statement might be, this is where you really get to zoom back out to think about the broader implications of the project. I view this section as a funnel where you begin with the zoomed out impacts, slowly narrow back to the previous problem statement, and finish with a punchy sentence. I view this as a argumentation paragraph.

 Start BROAD - how does your hypothesis fit into the broader field. Check resources like NSF vision documents for ideas on what is important in your discipline right now.

Make it clear what the knowledge gap is. Then describe how your work bridges the gap. Make it super clear to *any* geoscientist - no jargon or overly detail-ridden sentences.

Make sure to address the significance in multiple ways, eg why it's significant to your hypothesis/research question, the particular method you used/the geological setting where you're doing your research, and then finally the broader impacts of your results 

Avoid saying it's significant because it hasn't been done.  Try to think about why it matters for either understanding processes or for people!

Make sure you sell it in a way that its beneficial to the field you're working in and provide specific citations to support your claim.

Relate the significance of your grant proposal to outstanding and current issues in your geologic field. Refer to recently published NSF white pages, or review papers highlighting grand challenges in your field. Demonstrate that your findings will make progress on one of these issues and is important for your field.

This section needs both include specific scientific outcomes and broader implications for society and scientific audiences. I also focused on the current scientific gap in my research field that I am trying to address.

Application Preparation**A figure is now a required element of the GSA grad research grant proposal (since 2016 or so), some of our awardees received the award before this was a requirement.

Application Preparation

**A figure is now a required element of the GSA grad research grant proposal (since 2016 or so), some of our awardees received the award before this was a requirement.

Advice on writing a compelling research plan

Align your research plan to directly investigate questions you present within your hypotheses. Be straight forward, and don't over-explain one method, because the word count in this section and be difficult to stay within.

Both reviewers complimented the grant proposal on being clear and logical -these seem to be important traits to the reviewers

Be realistic about time commitments. Draw it out by hand to make sure it's feasible.

State all components of the research plan up front (field work, analytical, etc.) and then expand on each component as necessary. If proposing field work, explain why you chose the area(s) and how you plan to collect data. If proposing analytical work, explain your dataset and what the proposed analyses will reveal #feasability. Show that you have thought about logistics -sampling strategy, fieldwork timeline, why your technique is better than others.

Clearly state what data you will collect and what it will tell you.

Give estimates of your timeline, make sure you know which labs or instruments you'll be using

Make sure that your methods are doable and that they directly address your hypothesis(es). To show that you can carry out your proposed methods, specifically state the laboratory/computational/etc. resources on your campus or elsewhere that you will be using (I.e. 'I will do xyz through the Proteomics and Metabolomics Facility at Colorado State University) so that it is a concrete plan. After stating the methods, include a statement saying "This will test my aforementioned hypotheses by XYZ" or similar to link back to hypothesis.

This paragraph is more technically written. If you label the hypotheses with H1 etc., then you can directly tie the methods in this paragraph to the hypotheses by referring to H1 etc. When listing field sites, I only include the information about the site that is pertinent to the proposed project to save on space.

A brief sentence or two at the end of the research plan with an example of how you will interpret observations/data can show reviewers how the data you plan to collect aligns with your research goal.

I would try to work backward from what you want to achieve. This will help you figure out what datasets you will need and quantifying how many measurements etc you will need to answer your hypothesis. I would try to be as specific as possible.

I applied to the GSA grant twice and only received it the second time. The reviewers from my first round said that I had too many strands of ideas in my proposal and the methods lacked specificity. In my successful GSA grant, a reviewer said that the proposed work included all the elements of a study at the intersection of sedimentology and geomorphology. I think it was helpful that I had worked on many of the ideas and clarified them between the first and second proposals. The only feedback I got was if the work was possible with just 4 field assistants. They were right, I ended up having the help of more than 6-7 people each day.

Advice on writing a compelling budget section

Specificity is key! Also, if you include anything in the methods section that will not be covered by the GSA grant, specify where those funds are coming from - the reviewers want to ensure that you can and will carry out the proposed project if you get the grant!

Do your homework. Don't just ballpark it, find out the exact rates you will need for, say, renting a vehicle, or what the per diem rates are for your university travel plan if you want to propose field work/travel (what will the campsites/hotels cost? will you have field/lab assistants to pay for food for? what will food cost for how many? what will each sample cost and where did you get that estimate? etc). Showing that level of detail again, inspires confidence that you know what you're doing and know what you are getting into. Basically, show the reviewers that you have thought about every step of your research plan, and have thought through what your research will cost.

Write a realistic budget, include as much detail as possible, such as specific airlines, places you will be staying, gas calculations. Don’t forget to include the little things such as sample bags, any analytical costs, and meal per firm. Demonstrate that you need this funding to make your project the best scientific contribution it can be.

For me, these are always very dry paragraphs that list the costs of things proposed in the research plan paragraph. My advice would be to keep the writing simple.

Make it align with everything you discuss within your research plan, and thoroughly plan out realistic costs.

This is also about feasibility. I looked up potential flights, campsites, car rentals to get a precise number. Budgets change but you should shoot for accuracy. Put EVERYTHING to show  you've thought of it, then there is a section for amount requested from GSA so for example my analyses are 100k but I only requested fieldwork $ from GSA

I would take advantage of existing rates for transportation, lodging, and per diem in your department.

Tips about Figures

A figure is now a required element of the GSA grad research grant proposal

The figure always helps. Include a figure (I think they were optional when I was writing my proposals -- hopefully they are required now). A lot of people really like to look at a figure and I have gotten feedback about how useful it was to see my figures. I would have a full page figure of figures (so there would be ~three - four different small figures on the larger one, each with its own caption. I was trying to squeeze in more information and visuals, but that seemed to work well for the reviewers who looked at it). Also, remember that they look at a million of these things, so keep them in mind -- make it easy and a pleasure to read!

The figure is extremely important. Reviews want to fund a publishable proposal, having a well formatted original figure demonstrates that your proposal is at the level of work currently being published and it will be published with just a little more work.

My reviewers loved how clear my figures were. You could tell what I was trying to do just from the figure and caption. Make the figure a central part of the grant application, not an after thought. In fact, I would brainstorm the figure first!

A quote from a reviewer!

"Each Reviewer deals with a larger volume of GSA student research grants and evaluates and ranks them according to motivation, hypothesis, figure, budget, budget justification, broader impacts, befits to career path, etc.. Given the volume and limited time that realistically can be devoted to each individual proposal, it is absolutely critical to concisely and effectively communicate hypothesis, impact, feasibility of work plan, and justification. Compelling proposals state the objectives and merit clearly and explicitly and without the need for the reviewer to find or interpret the significance of the proposed work. Hence, it’s crucial to state the hypothesis or relevance of the proposed research as prominently and clearly as possible. Help the reviewer to easily grasp the impact and merit of your proposed research."

Many survey participants shared their identities, and 72% of survey respondents indicated they would be willing to share all or part of their proposal documents as examples. You can contact them directly below. Please remember not all participants will be comfortable sharing their documents. Thanks to all of our participants!

Matt Nix, Claire Ruggles, Zachary Foster-Baril, Katherine Guns, Jordan Wang, Sara Schreder-Gomes (@sara_schreder), Emily Mixon (@emilyemixon), Kristina Butler (@futurerockdoc), Sarah George, Catherine Ross (@impact_rocks), Tshering Lama Sherpa (@GeoSherpini), Amelia Nelson (@amelia_rnelson), Kelly Thomson (@kellydthomson), Ogochukwu Ozotta (@OhGee_nature), Alison Tune (@waterUtalkinabt), Hima Hassenruck Gudipati (@himaglobe)

If you would like to contribute advice to this column or if we missed your name/Twitter handle please contact us here!